Monthly Archives: April 2015

Behold He Cometh – Part 1

Revelation 1:7: “Behold, he cometh with clouds; and every eye shall see him, and they also which pierced him: and all kindreds of the earth, shall wail because of him. Even so, Amen.”

This verse has two direct referents; (a) the phrase “coming with clouds” is found in Daniel 7:13 and (b) the phrase “look on him whom they have pierced” is from Zechariah 12:10. Other passages in the Scriptures also give us more context for interpreting Christ’s “coming”.[1]

Coming With Clouds

Daniel 7:13 speaks of the “Son of Man… coming with the clouds of heaven”. Jesus spoke of Himself as the “Son of Man,” a title used of the Messiah, (Matthew 26: 64 and Luke 19:9-10). In the context of His predictions of the destruction of Jerusalem, He clearly foretells that the “Son of Man” will be seen “coming in a cloud with power and great glory,” (Luke 21:27; Matthew 24:30.) The use of the terms “Son of Man” and “coming with clouds” brings to mind Daniel chapter 7, which so often serves as a referent to passages throughout the book of Revelation. The Revelation, “coming, appearance,” of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:7, is a record of the fulfillment of Daniel’s vision, and the establishment of Christ’s kingdom, Daniel 7:13, 14, 22, 27.

Daniel 7:27 was fulfilled when Jerusalem was destroyed in AD 70. The old, fallen kingdom of Israel ceased to exist and the Kingdom was given to Christ and His Body, “the people of the saints of the Most High; their kingdom shall be an everlasting kingdom, and all dominions shall serve and obey them,” Daniel 7:27. This completed the translation of the kingdom from an earthly kingdom to a heavenly one as foretold by Daniel.

Revelation 1:7 refers directly to the words of Christ in Matthew 26:64:
“Jesus saith unto him, Thou [the High Priest, singular] hast said: nevertheless I say unto you [plural, the chief priests and scribes], Hereafter shall ye [plural] see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven.”

When Jesus said: “ye shall see,” He was referring to Zechariah 12:10, “They shall look on Me whom they have pierced”

“And I will pour upon the house of David, and upon the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the spirit of grace and of supplications: and they shall look upon me whom they have pierced, and they shall mourn for him, as one mourneth for his only son, and shall be in bitterness for him, as one that is in bitterness for his firstborn. (Zech. 12:10)

This prophecy has been literally fulfilled according to John 19:37; it does not await a future fulfillment:
“36 For these things were done, that the Scripture should be fulfilled, A bone of him shall not be broken. 37 And again another Scripture saith, They shall look on him whom they pierced.” (John 19:36-37)

The phrase “they which pierced Him” refers directly to the men who pierced His side when they crucified Him, especially the chief priests and scribes to whom Jesus was speaking in Matthew 26:64. This verse requires that Christ’s coming in the clouds be fulfilled in the generation which crucified Him. It requires that some of these men should be alive when He “comes with clouds” in order to witness, in the flesh, His appearance or revelation.

The referent Scripture in Zechariah 12:10 foretells that “they shall mourn for him, as one mourns for an only child, and weep bitterly over him, as one weeps over a first-born.”

These are the ones who grieved for the demise of their fleshly kingship and priesthood. The slaughter of the babes of Bethlehem: “Rachel weeping for her children and would not be comforted, for they were not,” marked the end of the fleshly lineage of David’s heirs to the throne. Jesus’ miraculous escape marked Him as the last and only survivor for David’s dynasty, “an only child,” a “first-born.” When He was “pierced,” crucified, those who hoped for the fleshly fulfillment of the promises “mourned for Him as one would mourn for an only Son, and were in bitterness for Him as one that is in bitterness for his Firstborn, (or Heir).”

The people mourned not only their kingship but also their priesthood. The legitimate priesthood, descended from Aaron, had ceased to exist because the office had become merely a political appointment by Rome instead of the God ordained line of succession. The change of person in the pronouns in Zechariah 12:10: “look upon me” and “mourn for him” may indicate that they looked upon Christ, the One Who was pierced, and mourned for David whose dynasty and promises seemed to be ending in defeat.

In one sense of the word, the entire nation participated in and was judged for the crime of their leaders, for the nation ceased to exist as a fleshly nation. In this sense, they were all guilty of having “pierced” Him. Yet, those who would accept His grace were forgiven, even as He prayed for them while on the cross. His shed blood became the genetic blood of the New Israel.
[1] See WS at 1:7: “Coming”.

 

Made Us Kings and Priests

Revelation 1:6: “And hath made us kings and priests unto God and His Father, to Him be glory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen.

The RSV translates: “And made us a kingdom, priests to his God and Father.”

The Original Idea of Priesthood

In most ancient cultures only the kings and priests were educated and all literature was written by and for this group. But it is notable that now every Christian is a King and Priest, restoring God’s original plan to give Mankind dominion. This is not the distorted view of kingship and priesthood as Man dominating Man, however. God’s original plan was for Man to rule over The Flesh, that is, “everything that creeps upon the earth,” and subdue, not only the animal kingdom in general, but the passions and lusts of his own fleshly nature as well.

Power Lust

Even in his fallen estate, there is a need in Man for power. In its proper order, this need is fulfilled in self-discipline. When a society is made up of self-disciplined men, then there can be freedom, but when self-discipline fails, laws must be enacted and restrictions must be imposed by outside force in an effort to maintain order. The less self-discipline, the less freedom and the more chaotic the society. As the failure of law and order progresses, the power of brute force becomes the dominant force. Ultimately, the failure of self-discipline leads to the law of the jungle, “survival of the fittest,” the rule of tooth and claw and the disintegration of civilization.

Man’s need for power, misused, becomes “power-lust.” Like other lusts, it is insatiable; the more it is fed, the greater its appetite. A taste of power often makes the man ravenous as a wild beast that gets a taste of blood. The history of the world is replete with accounts of men who became maniacal tyrants through their lust for power. Power-lust is manifest in other forms than military and political; popularity, fame, and wealth are some of the variations in its form. It may even be found in religious systems. Indeed, there is no power so strong as the power of superstition.

The Flesh must be ruled; the Spirit must be free.

Only the man who can rule his own flesh can be free from the laws necessary to living in a society. Government, therefore, must not be seen as merely the objective, rational science of politics and law. This is only one of the more conspicuous manifestations of it. The body of laws enacted by legislative bodies is also a manifestation of the governing force but not the essence. Toynbee has wisely noted that codification of laws reaches its peak when the ungovernable forces of the flesh are about to bring down the structure of civilization.

What is Government?

The definition of government as a “social contract” is far too narrow. Indeed, the “social contract” might conceivably be anti-government. At best it can only deal with the limited aspect of Man’s relationship to Man. It leaves out the relationship of Man to himself and the prerequisite relationship of Man to God. I submit that government must be viewed as a closed continuum of Man to himself, Man to Man, and Man to God. I therefore reject the notion that government can be a separate science from religion.

It is commonly said that the family is the smallest unit of government. At the same time we speak of self-control or individual government. If the individual is a unit of government, then he, and not the family, would be the smallest unit. Is the individual a governing unit? The answer to this question determines whether or not democracy is possible, for democracy is self-government. Freedom is not the absence of government, but the ability to govern oneself.

Mastery of ‘The Flesh’

In the earliest records of civilization, writings and drawings depict Man struggling with a Beast. Indeed, this struggle continues its appeal even in modern times. One of the earliest fears of small children is of beasts. There is a deep symbolic significance to this dramatic appeal, for it represents Man’s struggle with his own fleshly passions. This struggle is vital to civilized society, for without it civilization is impossible. No relationship with others can survive unless and until Man comes to terms with himself. There must be a degree of mastery of the Flesh.

Marriage and Family Government

The earliest social contract on record is that of marriage, which began the governing unit of the family. The importance of this unit can not be over-emphasized as it is basic to all further social contracts. It is the most valuable and, if functioning properly, the only essential governing unit; without it, no greater unit can function properly. The concept of the family may be applied to ever widening groups – the community, the nation, the world. The essential relationships of Man to Man are those of the family, brothers, sisters, fathers, mothers, and children. If family ties are severed or strained, the person can hardly find the larger community compatible.

“Under God”

The source of all successful social interaction is compatibility with God. Government without a source and without a goal can not be. Man must ultimately realize that God is the source of control, of order, of law. It would naturally follow that He is also the goal, the ultimate Judge and Rewarder.

It is no accident that religions which teach symbolically the sacrifice of the passions, often symbolized by the sacrifice of animals, precede, produce and sustain civilizations. When passions are given full reign, civilizations fall.

God is no small concept. Unbelief is often the inability to see beyond the image of God one has fashioned for himself. But God is yet above and beyond as well as before and beneath all human ideas. Yet He has revealed Himself to Man in government. However, His government is not such that the undisciplined Man could perceive. The government which issues from God is not one of force, but one of choice. This is Freedom. The alternative is slavery to the passions. Freedom allows Man to develop his full potential; slavery exploits and dissipates his body, mind and soul.

Separation of Church and State?

There can, therefore, be no dichotomy between spiritual and secular governments. There can only be “separation of Church and State” in theory when these are merely separate manifestations of Man’s lust for power. Neither can have a desirable result unless the Spirit moves upon Man from within himself, effecting the conquering of passions and the desire for social order. The only legitimate source of this power within Man is God. Thus the circle is complete: God moves within Man; Man rises up to conquer passions, form social contracts, and in turn submits to the authority of God. Government in any other form is only, at best, the imposition of the will of the strong.

Prince of the Kings of the Earth

Revelation 1:5: “And from Jesus Christ, who is the faithful witness, and the first begotten of the dead, and the prince of the kings of the earth. ”

Jesus was mockingly called the “King of the Jews” and “King of Israel” when He was being crucified, (Mark 15: 12, 18, 26, 32). His resurrection proved that He was not only “King of the Jews” but also the Son of God with all power, even over death, hell and the grave.

The passage from Psalm 2:1-3: “The kings of the earth set themselves and the rulers take counsel together, against the Lord and his anointed” is quoted in Acts 4:26 as having been spoken of Jesus Christ. In Acts the “kings of the earth and rulers” is applied to Herod, Pilate and “the people of Israel.” We might, therefore, say that “rulers” applied to Herod and Pilate, while “kings of the earth” applied to “the people of Israel.”

Revelation 1:6: And hath made us kings and priests unto God and his Father; to him be gory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen.

The RSV translates: “And made us a kingdom, priests to his God and Father.”

1 Pet. 2:9-10 says: “But you [Christians] are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, God’s own people. Once you were no people, but now you are God’s people.” (RSV)

In context of verse 5, Jesus is not only the “Prince of the Kings of the Earth,” the natural Israel, but also of the New Israel, the Christians, who have been made “Kings and priests unto his God and Father.” The “kings of the earth” are those claiming fleshly descent from Abraham; the “kings and priests unto God” are those who through Christ have become the children of God through the faith of Abraham.

The Faithful Witness

Revelation 1:5: “Jesus Christ, who is the faithful witness, and the first-begotten of the dead, and the prince of the kings of the earth.”

In this passage Christ is shown to be The New Covenant, The Seed of David, The New Creation, and the King of Israel. He is “the faithful witness” which title is also claimed by Christ Himself in 3:14: “The words of the Amen, the faithful and true witness.”

The word faithful translates the Hebrew word ’âman, other meanings of which are: “to sustain, support, as to support or carry a child, to found or build up a building; to be faithful, trustworthy, sure, certain; to be of long continuance, perennial, as of a covenant.”

As a noun it means “a workman, artificer.” As an exclamation it indicates confirmation of the word of another and expresses a wish that that word be fulfilled. [1]

The word witness has been dealt with above, (verse 2). There is again, however, a difference in John as a “witness to the word of God and the testimony of Jesus Christ” and Jesus Christ as “The Faithful Witness, the Amen,” as John testifies of Christ, but Christ testifies of God because He is God.

The phrase faithful witness is also used in Psalm 89. The promise to The Seed of David was:
“(29)His seed also will I make to endure for ever, and his throne as the days of heaven. (36) His seed shall endure forever, and his throne as the sun before me. (37) It shall be established forever as the moon, and as a faithful witness in heaven. Selah.”

 “First-Begotten of the Dead”

Psalm 89:27 is a referent for this phrase and may be a partial quote: “And I will make him the first-born, the highest of the kings of the earth.” This Psalm is a hymn concerning God’s faithfulness to the covenant with David. The Psalm abounds with such words as faithfulness, steadfast love, established, firm, founded, foundation.

Christ as the First-born of the Dead probably is similar in meaning to “the beginning of God’s creation” in 3:14. The resurrection for the Christians meant the beginning of the new creation. Although Christ was indeed the beginning of the original creation in Genesis 1:2 as Light, He is now the beginning of the new creation as the Second Adam, Whose flesh has been translated into immortality. (See Romans 8:19-23; I1 Cor. 5:17; Galatians 6:15; Ephesians 2:15.)

“Prince of the Kings of the Earth”

Christ is here proclaimed to be that promised Seed of David and His throne is established in the heavens as the vision of Revelation 1:12-20 shows.

In Isaiah 55:3-4 the covenant with David is reaffirmed:

“I will make with you an everlasting covenant, my steadfast sure [a form of ’âman is used here] love for David. Behold I made him a witness to the peoples, a leader and commander for the peoples.” RSV

The Christian convert has been buried with Christ and raised from the dead, (Galatians 2:20; Colossians 2:12-13). Since Christ is the Seed of Promise, (Galatians 3:16), He is the eternal “Israel of God.” By participation in His resurrected Body, we are heirs together with Him of this reborn nation, Galatians 3:29 .

[1] Ges. Lexicon, 58-9.

The Great “I Am”

Revelation 1:4-“Him which is and which was and which is to come.”

Parallels:

1:8-“The Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty.”
4:8-“The Lord God Almighty, which was and is and is to come.”

11:17-“Lord God Almighty, which art and wast and art to come, because thou hast taken to thee thy great power and hast reigned,” (KJV)

16:5-“Thou who art and wast, O Holy One.”

This phrase is Christ’s identification of Himself as “The Great I Am” of Exodus 3:13-15.[1]

The Divine Name

The divine Name is a verb of existence: Yahweh – “I am He who creates,” or “I am that I am,” or “Being, I cause to be.”[2]

The name YAHWEH is called ‘the quadriliteral Name’ for in Hebrew it contains four letters and was considered by the Rabbis as being too holy to pronounce. Another Hebrew word which was used to represent this most holy Name was ‘oth.[3] [More on this later.]

In the RSV passages in 11:17 and 16:5 the future tense is conspicuously absent; there is no “is to come.” This more accurately reflects the Greek text than does the KJV. Perhaps this indicates that in the events seen in these visions He has already come. In 11:17 He has begun to reign; in 16:5 He has begun to judge.

“Jesus”

The Hebrew word standing behind this phrase might also be the word yesh. As a noun it means “being, existence, that which is present, ready.” It is most commonly used as a verb substantive, without distinction of number or tense, ‘”is, was, will be.” With a predicate, yesh gives an emphatic force, (BDB). If the subject of the verb form, however, is a pronoun, it is expressed by a suffix as if it were a noun form instead of a verb form. The form that would produce the translation “I Am” would then be almost or entirely the equivalent of “Jesus.”

The force of the name Yahweh is that of infinity brought into the present moment. The eternally existent God, eternity past and eternity future, is brought into the present finite moment.[4] Davies, in his book Rabbinic Judaism says:

“The community of Israel is a unity of past, present and future…. The Israelites to whom Amos spoke had come up from Egypt (3.2); this can be said because every Israelite shared in this experience….  Another excellent example of this method of thought occurs in the book of Joshua. {Note 2: “Joshua 24. See also Deut.26.5f.”} …. it follows that the experience of Christ can be re-enacted in the [individual Christian]: the Christian man can die and rise with his Lord (108-9).

Notes:

[1] Summers says: “Grace and peace are here pronounced as coming from ‘the one who is and the one who was and the one who is coming.’ This was a typical Jewish conception of God. It is a good reproduction of the Hebrew word for Jehovah– ‘the eternally existing one'” (Worthy Is the Lamb, p. 101). [Jehovah is the English equivalent of the Hebrew Yahweh.]

[2] See also John Bright, A History of Israel, Second Edition, (Philadelphia, The Westminster Press. 1972), p. 151-2.
In this and in the identification as “Aleph and Tau”, Christ is identifying with the Name Elohim, God in the plural, which Bright sees to be a name constituting a claim that He is the totality (plurality) of the manifestation of the deity, (p. 153). That is, not plural gods, but a plurality of manifestations of the One God.

[3] See M. Jastrow, Dictionary of the Targumim, the Talmud Babli and Yerushalmi, and the Midrashic Literature. (Brooklyn: Shalom. 1967 reprint).

[4] See also my Commentary on 1:8, “Alpha and Omega” and 1:17, “First and Last”.